
Lick ethnofascist boot leather and don’t Globalise the Intifada, peasants. In all seriousness, corrupt as fuck lying bootlicking laborite yuppies are telling us not to Globalise the Intifada. We’d best not Globalise the Intifada because some fucking browntongue who makes a career out of fucking other people over to get ahead, like the rest of his class, and who needs a trademark on his conscience, thinks Globalising the Intifada is a bad idea for the moneyed big knobs who donate to his election campaigns and keep him around that sweet sweet power. Mmm power. Bootlickers like power, but not Globalising the Intifada, so don’t offend bootlickers or big knobs who abort ethical core to get ahead and Globalise the Intifada. I hope you can all appreciate what a heinous idea it is to Globalise the Intifada. Globalise the Intifada? No thanks, I’d rather kiss the ring of unhinged state terrorists and enjoy all the privileges and perks attendant to ideological conformity. If you Globalise the Intifada you hate Jews and freedom and fun and cats and you’ve probably been tempted by sensual permissiveness which is why you’re such a heinous traitor to humanity who wants to Globalise the Intifada and not genocide surplus proletarians who are in the way of hundreds of billions of dollars in potential dividends from all the natural gas in the Gaza Sea. Why Globalise the Intifada when you can be an extractivist butcher. Obviously this is what communism does to people.

https://classautonomy.info/questions-for-zionists/
Zionist deflection from crimes against humanity in a nutshell:
- Catch criticism for perpetrating crimes against humanity
- Accuse the critic of wanting to perpetrate crimes against humanity against you to explain why being criticised and being attacked are the same thing
- Try to psychoanalyse the critic to figure out what subjective malfunction and maladaptive trait makes them want to criticise you for perpetrating crimes against humanity
- Carry on perpetrating crimes against humanity
- If you say bad things about crimes against humanity, you hate Jews.
The Guardian || The government wants to expand its hate speech laws to include the phrase “globalise the intifada” and other phrases.
“I will insist that ‘globalise the intifada’ is included in that list of hateful, violent rhetoric in New South Wales,” Minns said.
Intifada literally means uprising or resistance, and is the term used by Palestinians for uprisings against Israel. The first intifada ran from 1987 to 1993, the second from 2000 to around 2005.

Former Guardian correspondent Ewen MacAskill previously wrote the “enduring image of the first [intifada] is of Palestinian youths throwing rocks at Israeli soldiers”.
“The second was a full-scale confrontation, with Israel attacking Palestinian cities and towns with artillery, tanks, helicopters and jets while Palestinians fought back with rifles and explosives … [and] terrorised Israel by sending suicide bombers across its border… More than 3,000 Palestinians and more than 1,000 Israelis were killed.”
For Palestinians and their supporters it can mean resistance against oppression, but many Jewish groups and leaders see it as a call to violence against people of their faith.
Two people were arrested after allegedly shouting slogans calling for “intifada” during a protest by pro-Palestinian demonstrators in London on Wednesday, amid a new crackdown by the Met and Greater Manchester police in the UK. The group behind the protests said uttering the word “intifada” was not a call for violence and condemned police for the “political repression of protest for Palestinian rights”.
To ensure the expansion of hate speech laws survives legal challenges in NSW, the government will send laws to a parliamentary committee. Minns said the government will look to ban the phrase in the new year after the committee reports back.
Asked whether the phrase “from the river to the sea” would be banned, he said he would not prejudge the parliamentary committee’s investigation.
Minns also flagged NSW would take further action against preachers and community figures who promote hatred or violence, following a federal government crackdown announced this week.
More law reform will follow in 2026 if people find loopholes in the proposed changes, Daley said.
“We will not stop. This process will never end,” Daley said.
“We can’t force people to live together in harmony … [and] for those very small few who decide that they won’t do that, what is left at our disposal is strong legislation backed up by the best police force in the world.”
What does this mean for protests?
While specific bans on protests and the phrase “globalise the intifada” are yet to be legislated, Minns said residents who engage in either could face legal trouble.
Chanting “globalise the intifada” may already be in breach of existing hate speech laws in the state, according to advice provided to government, Minns said.
“You’re running a very risky racket if you’re thinking of using that phrase before the bill goes through,” he said.
Minns also warned police would not tolerate breaches of the law, including at any unauthorised protests planned for this week.
“If there’s an unauthorised protest and they attempt to go on the street, take over the streets, then they’ll met with the full force of the law,” he said.
Police have warned any large-scale public gatherings will face a significant policing response.

― Frank Zappa
Discover more from Class Autonomy
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.