X-Ray Mike || Luke Kemp’s Goliath’s Curse: The History and Future of Societal Collapse provides one of the most thorough and data-driven analyses of the factors leading to the downfall of powerful societies throughout history. Kemp argues that industrial civilization is uniquely vulnerable to collapse due to structural fragility, elite capture, environmental overshoot, and inequality, and highlights the role of overpopulation and authoritarianism in this process. This essay will synthesize the book’s core arguments, assess their realism using contemporary research, explore major historical case studies, analyze policy implications, and offer best- and worst-case scenarios for the future.
Realism of Kemp’s Projections
Kemp’s thesis draws on 324 historical case studies and massive datasets to demonstrate that collapse is rarely the result of just one failure. Instead, accumulation of inequality, elite overreach, dwindling resources, and the immiseration of the masses are consistent precursors. Contemporary researchers validate this viewpoint: the globalized, interdependent world—where economic, military, and technological complexity converge—exhibits even greater structural fragility due to networked dependencies and systemic risks.
Critically, Kemp’s emphasis on inequality resonates with both ancient and modern collapse research. Societies from Rome to the Maya suffered fragmentation when the benefits of growth became concentrated in elites, leaving the majority disenfranchised and impoverished. Modern industrial society magnifies this problem, as wealth gaps have reached historic highs and political polarization erodes legitimacy, directly reflecting the book’s warnings. However, before projecting certainty, it is important to acknowledge that many historic collapses occurred in less interconnected worlds. The global scale of today’s civilization means any collapse will affect all regions, not just local populations.
Overpopulation: Catalyst and Effect
While population pressures have always affected collapse dynamics, today’s challenges are unprecedented. UN projections suggest the global population may peak at around 10.3 billion by the 2080s, although some research predicts an earlier plateau and possible decline as fertility drops. Kemp argues that high population density fosters resource scarcity, urban stress, political volatility, and environmental destruction—wickedly amplifying the curse of complex, hierarchical societies.
Historical studies show overpopulation has often accelerated collapse. For instance, in the late Bronze Age, excessive population and resource consumption strained food and energy supplies, hastening the demise of empires. Modern parallels can be found in urban over-crowding, food insecurity, and the strain on water and ecosystems. Overpopulation makes effective governance harder, drives demand for authoritarian solutions, and can both trigger and intensify post-collapse crises.
Major Global Population Correction
Although catastrophic population corrections have occurred in the past (e.g., the Black Death, colonial epidemics), projections for the 21st century vary. Some experts warn of mass die-offs from climate-induced crop failures, pandemics, and conflict—especially if collapse is abrupt and poorly managed. Others predict that population will decline gradually as fertility rates fall globally, initiated by socioeconomic shifts rather than mass mortality. A rapid correction is less likely unless environmental or political shocks become overwhelming, but historical precedent suggests such events cannot be ruled out.
Who Will Survive?
Patterns from past collapses indicate that groups and regions with high social cohesion, local resource security, and flexible, inclusive institutions have higher survival prospects. Democratic, egalitarian communities tend to rebuild faster and maintain order. Authoritarian systems, while able to mobilize resources during crises, are more fragile over the long term due to lack of legitimacy and elite infighting. Kemp’s studies of Roman and Han China illustrate that social fragmentation and internal division often prove fatal, while resilience stems from adaptive, decentralized networks.
Survival will depend on:
- Geographic luck: regions less affected by climate change or disaster.
- Social capital: communities with strong local networks and trust.
- Adaptability: ability to shift production, resource use, and governance.
Major Environmental Challenges
Environmental challenges are both causes and results of collapse. Kemp and contemporary research highlight several urgent threats:
- Resource Depletion: Water, soil, and fossil fuels are already under critical pressure. Ecological overshoot leads directly to collapse.
- Climate Change: Droughts, floods, and extreme weather events disrupt agriculture and settlements.
- Biodiversity Loss: Disruption of ecosystems threatens food security and stability.
- Pollution: Urban and industrial stress increases disease and health problems, reduces resilience.
These problems often compound, creating feedback loops—such as crop failure driving social unrest, leading to political collapse, which in turn worsens environmental management.
Case Studies from the Book
Cahokia
The city of Cahokia, rising near the Mississippi River over 1,000 years ago, was North America’s first true city but exemplifies what Kemp calls the “curse of Goliath.” Agricultural surplus fueled rapid population growth and a stratified priestly elite, who relied on human sacrifice and oppression to maintain control. Eventually, resource depletion and social stress led to abandonment. Within a century, its population halved, and its urban experiment was never revived—demonstrating how centralized power and inequality, amid environmental strain, precipitate terminal collapse.
Rome and Han China
Both empires fell after long periods of elite domination, expansion, and bureaucracy, suffering diminishing returns on complexity and resource management. While Rome’s aftermath was fragmentation, the legacy persisted through democratic innovation, relative to Cahokia’s oblivion. Han China’s collapse was rapid, but the culture and institutions endured through adaptation and decentralized networks. Kemp uses these to illustrate how collapse varies: authoritarian, hierarchical societies are more vulnerable, but cultural resilience and inclusive institutions can mitigate suffering.
Colonialism and the Black Death
Colonization involved demographic collapse for indigenous populations, yet fueled expansion and technological innovation among colonizers. The Black Death killed one-third to one-half of Europe’s population, but survivors experienced a redistribution of wealth, rising wages, egalitarian gains, and health improvements—demonstrating that collapse, under specific conditions, can benefit the majority, especially with inclusive social structures.
Policy Implications for Avoiding or Mitigating Collapse
Kemp and associated studies argue that conscious, systemic reform is essential to avoid collapse and mitigate its effects.
- Redistribute Power and Wealth: Tackle inequality with progressive taxation, strengthened welfare, and inclusive governance. Avoid elite capture.
- Build Societal Resilience: Decentralize decision-making, invest in local food, water, and energy systems, and strengthen social networks.
- Educate and Adapt: Promote ecological literacy, adaptive skills, and creative problem solving to prepare transitional generations for changed realities.
- International Cooperation: Develop new global governance structures to address climate, migration, conflict, and technology risks.
- Limit Dangerous Technologies: Regulate AI, biotech, and nuclear weapons to avoid existential threats.
Kemp warns that technical solutions alone are insufficient; true change means reforming institutions and cultural attitudes to power, competition, and resource use.
Best-Case Scenario
The best-case future involves a deliberate transition away from extractive, hierarchical systems toward decentralized, inclusive, and sustainable models. Population stabilizes and gradually declines due to voluntary changes, not disaster. An international movement toward ecological stewardship, equity, and resilience reforms global governance to address environmental challenges proactively. Collapse, if it occurs, is mitigated by adaptive networks—survivors experience greater freedom and equality, echoing post-Black Death Europe.
- Widespread adoption of renewable energy and sustainable practices.
- Inclusive governance and participatory policymaking.
- Strong global cooperation on climate, health, and migration.
- Communities empowered to manage local resources and recovery.
- Education and cultural change fostering adaptability and resilience.
Worst-Case Scenario
The worst-case scenario is a rapid, cascading collapse driven by unchecked overpopulation, ecological overshoot, mass poverty, and authoritarian retrenchment. Resource wars, famines, pandemics, and political breakdown drive mass mortality. Survivors form small, isolated groups, constantly threatened by violence, scarcity, and environmental devastation. Authoritarian regimes seize power, but their fragility delivers only short-lived, brutal order. Cultural and technological regression is widespread, and recovery takes centuries, if at all.
- Abrupt population collapse due to disaster, conflict, and disease.
- Breakdown of central authority—rise of local warlords and fragmentation.
- Environmental devastation worsened by abandoned infrastructure.
- Widespread suffering, loss of cultural and technological knowledge.
- Long-term decline for most survivors, unless new inclusive models can be rebuilt.
Conclusion
Goliath’s Curse offers a profound and empirically supported warning for modern civilization: elite-dominated hierarchies and overpopulation render societies fragile, and collapse is not only possible but historically frequent. Case studies show that collapse need not mean universal disaster, but the difference lies in inclusiveness, adaptability, and resource equity. The best hope for humanity is a conscious, collective pivot toward resilience, cooperation, and sustainability—without which, the worst excesses of collapse may be upon us sooner than expected.
Based on the synthesis of recent history, human psychology, and the latest global data, the most likely trajectory for industrial civilization is a period of escalating instability and decline, rather than a sudden, total collapse. The world is already experiencing the early stages of this process: resource depletion, peaking food production, persistent pollution, and the intensification of climate change are converging with rising inequality, political polarization, and the erosion of democratic norms. Human psychology—particularly the tendency to delay action until crises are undeniable, the allure of authoritarian solutions in times of fear, and the inertia of entrenched interests—suggests that meaningful, coordinated reform will be slow and uneven.
Environmental degradation is the most critical and non-negotiable constraint. As ecosystems unravel, food and water insecurity will increase, driving migration, conflict, and further political instability. The global economy will likely enter a prolonged period of “degrowth,” whether managed or chaotic, as the limits of resource extraction and pollution sinks are reached. Technological innovation may delay some impacts, but cannot substitute for the foundational services provided by a stable biosphere.
A major global population correction is probable within this century, driven not only by declining fertility but also by rising mortality from environmental and social stressors. The survivors will be those communities and regions that foster social cohesion, adaptability, and local resource security. Authoritarian regimes may rise in the short term, but their inherent fragility and lack of legitimacy make them poor candidates for long-term stability. The best-case scenario remains possible—a managed transition to a smaller, more equitable, and sustainable global society—but this will require unprecedented levels of cooperation, foresight, and institutional reform.
In sum, the coming decades will test the resilience and wisdom of humanity as never before. The window for proactive, collective action is rapidly closing. If current trends continue, the world will face a future marked by hardship, fragmentation, and loss—but also by the possibility of renewal, if the lessons of history and the warnings of science are finally heeded.
References
PMC. “Societal Collapse and Intergenerational Disparities in Suffering.” August 27, 2022. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9419136/
Carrington, Damian. “Goliath’s Curse.” The Guardian. August 2025. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/aug/02/self-termination-history-and-future-of-societal-collapse
Donald, Rachel. “Collapse for the 99% | Luke Kemp – by Rachel Donald.” Planet: Critical. August 27, 2025. https://www.planetcritical.com/p/luke-kemp
Dahl, Arthur. “Societal Collapse.” International Environment Forum. August 2025. https://iefworld.org/node/1756
Diamond, Jared. Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed. Viking, 2005.
Homer-Dixon, Thomas. The Upside of Down: Catastrophe, Creativity, and the Renewal of Civilization. Island Press, 2008. https://islandpress.org/books/upside-down
Kemp, Luke. Goliath’s Curse: The History and Future of Societal Collapse. Viking, 2025. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/219301731-goliath-s-curse
Lynch, Andrew. “Goliath’s Curse: Powerful if uneven portrait of societal collapse sings the praises of Irish Citizens.” Irish Times. August 2025. https://www.irishtimes.com/culture/books/2025/08/05/goliaths-curse-powerful-if-uneven-portrait-of-societal-collapse-sings-the-praises-of-irish-citizens-assembly/
Simon, Ed. “Are We Headed for Apocalypse? This Book Says It’s a 1-in-3 Chance.” The New York Times. October 2, 2025. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/02/books/review/luke-kemp-goliaths-curse.html
Scheffer, Marten, et al. “The vulnerability of aging states: A survival analysis across premodern societies.” 2023. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2218834120
Tainter, Joseph. The Collapse of Complex Societies. Cambridge University Press, 1988.
Turchin, Peter. End Times: Elites, Counter-Elites, and the Path of Political Disintegration. Penguin, 2023.
BBC Future. “Are we on the road to civilisation collapse?” BBC. February 18, 2019. https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20190218-are-we-on-the-road-to-civilisation-collapse
United Nations Population Division. “World Population Prospects 2024.” https://population.un.org/wpp/
Earth.Org. “15 Biggest Environmental Problems of 2025.” January 19, 2025. https://earth.org/the-biggest-environmental-problems-of-our-lifetime/
Berman, Art. “Goliath’s Curse: Bold Claims and Hidden Traps.” September 30, 2025. https://www.artberman.com/blog/goliaths-curse-bold-claims-and-hidden-traps/
The Economist. “Humanity will shrink, far sooner than you think.” September 11, 2025. https://www.economist.com/interactive/briefing/2025/09/11/humanity-will-shrink-far-sooner-than-you-think
MAHB. “Overpopulation and the Collapse of Civilization.” November 5, 2013. https://mahb.stanford.edu/blog/overpopulation-and-the-collapse-of-civilization/
Middle Way Society. “Goliath’s Curse: The History and Future of Societal Collapse.” October 8, 2025. https://www.middlewaysociety.org/goliaths-curse-the-history-and-future-of-societal-collapse/
Journals. “Can a collapse of global civilization be avoided?” Royal Society Publishing. March 7, 2013. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2012.2845
EarthArXiv. “Human Civilization will Collapse (High Confidence).” January 6, 2025. https://eartharxiv.org/repository/view/6520/
Discover more from Class Autonomy
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
