Cover: via https://www.ebay.ca/itm/154874512440
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DbyXGmLfufs
Crust News || As U.S. and Iranian delegations arrived in Switzerland for talks on the end to the war between the countries, Beni Sabti, a senior Iran analyst at Tel Aviv’s Institute for National Security Studies and a former IDF intelligence officer of some three decades, quote-posted the commentator Jason Brodsky, adding in a horrific call for an attack on the USA.
Brodsky was lamenting the new U.S.-Iran memorandum of understanding, the one signed on 17 June, whose first clause commits both states to a permanent end to military operations on all fronts, Lebanon included. To Brodsky, folding Lebanon into the deal was the USA “acquiescing to Iranian demands,” one of the biggest mistakes Washington could make. Despite the fact that Israel and Lebanon had a preexisting ceasefire agreement.
The security analyst, who has played a major role in shaping the Israeli government’s media strategy for Farsi-speaking populations, later edited the post in an attempt to hide his wish for an attack on the USA.
Sabti’s reply, in its first version, read that the USA might “need another Pearl harbor or 9/11 to remember who is the enemy and who is the friend.” An hour later it read something far more gentle: “Good luck for USA to handle Iran regime terrorists. I hope for USA administration to remember who is the enemy and who is the friend.” Sabti was clearly triggered into the edit by the initial response to his call for violence, as U.S. commenters stormed the post to announce their grievance at his words.
Version history on X preserves the original post for anyone who wants to see it. However, the default view will show the altered text, rather than showing the desire of a security analyst, with strong government ties, to see renewed attacks on the USA.
A man whose career was built inside the Israeli security establishment, who founded the IDF’s Persian-language spokesperson unit, who is booked by the Times of Israel and the Middle East Forum as a trusted voice on matters in Tehran, was so offended at the prospect of the USA ending a war with Iran that he openly called for violence in the USA.
https://classautonomy.info/questions-for-zionists/
Only naturally, the U.S. media sphere has not condemned the words of a man who has worked closely with their own government. The one outlet to touch it, the International Business Times, ran it not as a scandal but as an “unverified” viral claim, leaning on the post being reportedly deleted to keep it at arm’s length. Had any other person with ties to any other government called for another 9/11, it would be condemned across the U.S. media sphere, not fact-checked into doubt.
The edit was a knee jerk reaction, he knew exactly how this looked, and rushed to change the wording. He didn’t delete the post, and should it be needed by far-right extremists, it is still available to link to. That doesn’t represent a retraction of the idea, nor has any apology been offered to the U.S. public.
The friendship Sabti frets the USA has forgotten runs in one direction, it always has. If your friends will reach to your darkest days as a pressure tactic, are they really your friends?
